February 15, 2012

UNACCEPTABLE

Image: UNACCEPTABLE

Diverse group of more than 500 academics and religious leaders call Obama’s HHS statement “Unacceptable” 

See updated “UNACCEPTABLE” page here.*

For Immediate Release: February 15, 2012

In response to President Obama’s announcement of a government compromise over the new controversial mandate requiring employers to pay for abortion-causing drugs and other services, over 300 academics have signed a statement entitled: “Unacceptable.”

“This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand,” state the scholars. “It is an insult to the intelligence of Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox Christians, Jews, Muslims, and other people of faith and conscience to imagine that they will accept an assault on their religious liberty if only it is covered up by a cheap accounting trick.”

Since its issuance last week, the statement has been joined by over 300 other individuals.  This list continues to grow.  The signatories to this statement come from an extraordinarily broad and diverse array of backgrounds and from a variety of disciplines; they include religious leaders, faculty, staff, and presidents from large research universities, liberal arts colleges, and seminaries.  They also come from a richly diverse spectrum of traditions: Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, LDS, and nonreligious.  They come from widely divergent political views and parties: conservative, moderate, liberal/progressive, democrat, republican, and independent. Some openly identify themselves as life-long Democrats who voted for President Obama in 2008.

To be sure, not every signatory agrees on the morality of the use of contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient drugs.    What unites the signatories is the conviction that the government should not coerce religious institutions or individuals into violating their most deeply held beliefs as a condition of serving or employing those who do not share their faith.

The original drafters of the letter are Harvard’s Mary Ann Glendon, Princeton’s Robert P. George, Notre Dame’s Carter Snead, Catholic University of America’s president John Garvey and Yuval Levin, of the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

The signers also include a diverse number of religious leaders such as the Vice President of the US Catholic Conference of Bishops, Archbishop Kurtz, Philadelphia’s Archbishop Chaput,  Prison Fellowship’s Chuck Colson, the Mother Superior for the Sisters of Life,  Dr. Paige Patterson, former President of the Southern Baptist Convention and Reverend Frederick R. Parke.

The complete list is here. However, among the many notable academics are Columbia University’s Department of Medicine and Physician in Chief, Donald Landry; Stanford’s Michael McConnell; University of Chicago, Jean Bethke Elshtain; Notre Dame Law School’s Margaret F. Brinig, University of Toronto’s David Novak, University of Texas Austin’s Thomas Pangle; Emory’s Ann Hartle;  BYU’s Cole Durham; and, Jewish Theological Seminary’s Alan Mittleman.

For more information or to arrange an interview please call or email Emily Hardman at 202.349.7224,  ehardman@becketfund.org.

###

Additional Resources:

HHS Case Page


  • Jeff

    Bravo!

  • Charles Walkup, Jr.

    It is very heartening to see this stand. I stand with you.
    I think we should offer a solution that would satisfy the goal of providing birth control for those who choose it but cannot afford it, one that does not coerce unwilling victims to participate. Jesus always laid out the truth, but he never coerced anyone, allowing others to make their own decision.
    My suggestion: The government can set up an account just for those who lack financial means to use it (something like food stamps). Financially needy persons would apply for it. The difference is that it would not be funded by taxing the general public. The government would announce that the account would be funded by freewill contributions from those who are financially able and want to see birth control made available to all desiring it. No once is coerced against their conscience. The president and Sibelius get what they want without violating the Constitution.
    Another suggestion:
    Change the mandate to say that the participating male will pay for the woman’s birth control. Penalize the man if he fails to provide and a pregnancy occurs. This will keep financial responsibility with the participants. Married couples needing assistance could apply for suggestion #1 above.